$11.99
Our Reader™ software is required to purchase and download eBooks. Download it here.Click here to purchase this book!
The price of this eBook was set by Random House Digital Inc.
Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism
Overview
"Liberals' loyalty to the United States is off-limits as a subject of political debate. Why is the relative patriotism of the two parties the only issue that is out of bounds for rational discussion "
In a stunning follow-up to her number one bestseller Slander, leading conservative pundit Ann Coulter contends that liberals have been wrong on every foreign policy issue, from the fight against Communism at home and abroad, the Nixon and the Clinton presidencies, and the struggle with the Soviet empire right up to today's war on terrorism. "Liberals have a preternatural gift for always striking a position on the side of treason," says Coulter. "Everyone says liberals love America, too. No, they don't." From Truman to Kennedy to Carter to Clinton, America has contained, appeased, and retreated, often sacrificing America's best interests and security. With the fate of the world in the balance, liberals should leave the defense of the nation to conservatives. Reexamining the sixty-year history of the Cold War and beyond - including the career of Senator Joseph McCarthy, the Whittaker Chambers - Alger Hiss affair, Ronald Reagan's challenge to Mikhail Gorbachev to "tear down this wall," the Gulf War, and our present war on terrorism - Coulter reveals how liberals have been horribly wrong in all their political analyses and policy prescriptions.
Author Information
Editorial Reviews
No one can accuse Coulter of timidity when it comes to voicing her political opinions. In a follow-up to her book Slander, she continues her attack on liberals, calling them among other things "traitors, Soviet lovers, stupid, and weak." She lays waste to Democrats such as FDR, Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, and (here's where her knife is especially sharp) Clinton. The author is particularly venomous when discussing the dim-wittedness of Hollywood celebrities who dare to give their views on matters of foreign and domestic policy. Reader Kathe Mazur provides just the right amount of sarcasm and humor to mark Coulter's take-no-prisoners style. Many librarians will have to overlook their personal political philosophies and offer this book to their customers. What Coulter has to say is not always pretty or "politically correct," but it is always well documented and intelligently stated.-Joseph L. Carlson, Allan Hancock Coll., Lompoc, CA Copyright 2004 Reed Business Information. -- PUBLISHERS WEEKLY.
Customer Reviews
Showing 1-10 of the 10 most recent reviews
-
1.
Review from
is a social reading site where members can share and review the books they're readingPosted August 06, 2011 by , Delta Junction, AK
-
2.
Review from
is a social reading site where members can share and review the books they're readingPosted August 03, 2011 by ,
-
3.
Review from
is a social reading site where members can share and review the books they're readingPosted August 02, 2011 by , Tokyo, 40, Japan
-
4.
Review from
is a social reading site where members can share and review the books they're readingPosted July 25, 2011 by , Grays, The United Kingdom
-
5.
Review from
is a social reading site where members can share and review the books they're readingPosted July 22, 2011 by ,
-
6.
Review from
is a social reading site where members can share and review the books they're readingPosted April 21, 2011 by , Dubai, 03, The United Arab Emirates
-
7.
Review from
is a social reading site where members can share and review the books they're readingPosted June 25, 2008 by , The United States
-
8.
Review from
is a social reading site where members can share and review the books they're readingPosted March 24, 2008 by , Richmond, VA
-
9.
Review from
is a social reading site where members can share and review the books they're readingPosted March 06, 2008 by , Medford, MA
-
10.
Review from
is a social reading site where members can share and review the books they're readingPosted February 12, 2008 by , Eagle Mountain, UT
-
- 1
-

-
- 1
-

Product Details
-
Published by
Crown Forum
-
Publish Date
October 04, 2004
-
Print ISBN
1400050324
-
eBook ISBN
9781400051700
-
Imprint
Crown Forum
-
Filesize
361.75 KB
-
Number of Print Pages*
368
* Number of eBook pages may differ. Click here for more information.
Excerpt from Treason by Ann Coulter
Fifty Years of Treason
Liberals have a preternatural gift for striking a position on the side of treason. You could be talking about Scrabble and they would instantly leap to the anti-American position. Everyone says liberals love America, too. No they don't. Whenever the nation is under attack, from within or without, liberals side with the enemy. This is their essence. The left's obsession with the crimes of the West and their Rousseauian respect for Third World savages all flow from this subversive goal. If anyone has the gaucherie to point out the left's nearly unblemished record of rooting against America, liberals turn around and scream "McCarthyism!"
Liberals invented the myth of McCarthyism to delegitimize impertinent questions about their own patriotism. They boast (lyingly) about their superior stance on civil rights. But somehow their loyalty to the United States is off-limits as a subject of political debate. Why is the relative patriotism of the two parties the only issue that is out of bounds for discussion Why can't we ask: Who is more patriotic ' Democrats or Republicans You could win that case in court.
Fifty years ago, Senator Joe McCarthy said, "The loyal Democrats of this nation no longer have a Party."(1) Since then, the evidence has continued to pour in. Liberals mock Americans who love their country, calling them cowboys, warmongers, religious zealots, and jingoists. By contrast, America's enemies are called "Uncle Joe," "Fidel," "agrarian reformers," and practitioners of a "religion of peace." Indeed, Communists and terrorists alike are said to be advocates of "peace."
Liberals demand that the nation treat enemies like friends and friends like enemies. We must lift sanctions, cancel embargoes, pull out our troops, reason with our adversaries, and absolutely never wage war ' unless the French say it's okay. Any evidence that anyone seeks to harm America is stridently rejected as "no evidence." Democratic senators, congressmen, and ex-presidents are always popping up in countries hostile to the United States ' Cuba, Nicaragua, North Korea, Iraq ' hobnobbing with foreign despots who hate America. One year after Osama bin Laden staged a massive assault on America, a Democratic senator was praising bin Laden for his good work in building "day care centers." At least we can be thankful that in the war on terrorism, we were spared the spectacle of liberals calling Osama bin Laden an "agrarian reformer."
The ACLU responded to the 9-11 terrorist attack by threatening to sue schools that hung god bless america signs. Is the ACLU more or less patriotic than the Daughters of the American Revolution Public schools across the nation prohibited the saying of the Pledge of Allegiance. Is it more patriotic or less patriotic to prevent schoolchildren from saying the Pledge of Allegiance University professors called patriotic Americans "naive" and described patriotism as a "benign umbrella for angry people."(2) Is it more patriotic to love your country or to ridicule those who do as "naive" and "angry" These are not questions impenetrable to human logic.






is a social reading site where members can share and review the books they're reading








